Thank you for your many comments about the picture that I posted. I must say that I take offense to being called disproportionate and "porky." Although the argument can certainly be made that I am, in the words of Dad, "all jacked up," this is in reference mainly to my extremeties. When it comes to sheer looks I am clearly the best looking out of all of us. (and don't ask your wives if they think you are better looking than me because that don't mean a thing to me. They're your wives for Pete's sake)
Anyway, Drew was correct in noticing the height discrepancy between himself and myself. I am about two or three inches shorter than him in the picture. Jeff towers over me by a good 6 inches. Mark, who in real life isn't more than an inch taller than me, appears to be able to look down on me from his lofty heights of six foot nothing. For some reason I appear to be very short in the picture. At first I thought it was because you couldn't see my legs and I was standing spread eagle or something like that. This isn't the case because at a close examination my legs are clearly visible. I really can't explain why I appear so short in the picture. Perhaps it is the camera lens or maybe it is my bad posture, I don't know, but what I do know is that I am most cerainly taller than Drew. Shrimp!!!!
4 comments:
Sorry Adam, the dream is over. My point,which is about 1 inch inh height puts me at about an inch taller than you. You might have me without the point, but my birth defect does serve some purpose. And that it to be taller than you.
P.S. The real problem is that your legs are way to long in the picture.
Nobody said anything about the curl of hair on my forehead.
Clearly there was some sort of warping of the space/time continuum when that photo was taken.
I think the reason my legs look so long is because I am following the old man's advice and wearing them up at my belly button.
Post a Comment